- Home
- My Profile
- Illum Texts
- Antext
- Literature
- British Lit
- Shakespeare
- American Lit
- World Lit
- Classical Lit (Greek, Roman, Myths)
- Literary Criticism
- Writing Lessons
- Movie Lessons
- Lessons
- Forums
- Audio
- Groups
- Quotes
- Alumni
What is (and should be) the role of technology in the classroom?
Submitted by scotese on Sat, 2008-11-22 07:30
Everywhere that teachers look around us - we find technology being used in the classroom: Laptops, Smart Boards, Power Point Presentations. Sure, it's here - but the question is - has it made education any better. Is technology a good way to spend time (both in the learning how to use it and its actual implementation) and money? Are those teachers that are resisting technology a hinderance to giving our students a better education? Let us know what you think.
Groups:
Text to Remember
Recent comments
The most recent comments
-
Lisa_D
commented on
1 week 6 days ago
-
kdorsey
commented on
2 weeks 8 min ago
-
kdorsey
commented on
2 weeks 16 min ago
-
doc snout
commented on
2 weeks 2 days ago
-
rvaitla
commented on
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
rvaitla
commented on
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
rvaitla
commented on
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
Vickylicious
commented on
3 weeks 6 days ago
-
Vickylicious
commented on
3 weeks 6 days ago
-
Vickylicious
commented on
3 weeks 6 days ago
Fresh Ink - Most Recent Content
The six most recent lessons or stories.
-
3 hours 16 min ago
-
3 hours 21 min ago
-
3 weeks 1 day ago
-
4 weeks 1 hour ago
-
7 weeks 4 days ago
-
7 weeks 5 days ago
The most recent comments
-
Byron's "Childe Harold's Pilgrimage" a Cooperative Journey
1 week 6 days ago
-
Should English Teachers spend time talking about what an author meant?
2 weeks 8 min ago
-
Teaching Hamlet
2 weeks 16 min ago
-
Teaching The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
2 weeks 2 days ago
-
The Earth
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
Should English Teachers spend time talking about what an author meant?
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
Should English Teachers spend time talking about what an author meant?
3 weeks 4 days ago
-
Should students be routinely quizzed to determine if they have read the assigned text?
3 weeks 6 days ago
-
Should students be routinely quizzed to determine if they have read the assigned text?
3 weeks 6 days ago
-
Once & Future King: Links with Macbeth
3 weeks 6 days ago
The 10 Most Recent Audio Files to be posted
-
Tue, 2013-04-09 00:49
-
Mon, 2013-04-08 21:01
-
Mon, 2013-04-08 02:07
-
Mon, 2013-04-08 00:57
-
Thu, 2013-04-04 23:15
-
Thu, 2013-04-04 16:14
-
Mon, 2013-04-01 11:43
-
Mon, 2013-04-01 11:42
-
Mon, 2013-04-01 08:19
-
Mon, 2013-04-01 02:22
Most Recent Illuminated Text
Well-Worn (Popular) Text
Lessons and handouts sorted by views - though not necessarily by downloads.
Illuminated Text (both Flash and Power Point) sorted by views though not necessarily by downloads.
- Cat in the Rain by Jenny Lee
- "Indian Camp" - Illuminated text by Jesus Alonso
- Illuminated text on Interchapter V by Maria Verdos & Carli Segal
- The House on Mango Street - An Illuminated Text example
- "House" an Illuminated Text by Norberto Rivera and Danny Chan
- "Sally" an Illuminated Text by Marjorie Easley and Denisha Brown
- Peacekeepers by Jenny Lee & M. Rodriguez
- Won't You Join Up? An Illuminated Text by Beata Kasiarz & Saquina Haque
- Sonnet 97 an Illuminated Poem by Alex Nuttall and Alex Galus
- Sonnet 46 - "Mine Eye and Heart" an Illuminated Text by Toni Qui and E. Yau
Audio sorted by numbers of plays.
- A Day in the Booth
- The murder of Emmett Till - A Sound Portraits Production
- "Indian Camp" - A class discussion of Ernest Hemingway's story - 2009 - 4th Period
- Beautiful sounds of Whitney Young by Sean (Yixion) Liu
- Go Dog Go - Stephen Booth and Literary Criticism - 9th Period - 2011
- The Three Witches - 5th Period
- To Jane - A Song by Alaina Stacey, inspired by Catcher in the Rye
- The Prologue to the Wife of Bath's Tale: A Class Discussion
- The Sounds of Whitney Young, Elizabeth Mucha, 2008
- James Joyces Counterparts - A Class Discussion May 13, 2011
Forum topics sorted by number of responses
- Should students be routinely quizzed to determine if they have read the assigned text?
- What is (and should be) the role of technology in the classroom?
- Should teachers interject their own political beliefs into the classroom?
- A clash of symbols: does the teaching of ideas such as "symbols," and "theme" help or hurt a student's understanding of the text
- Why I became (or want to become) a teacher
- Should teachers friend their current students on Facebook?
- Is there a way to decrease the amount of cheating in our classrooms?
- Rudeness in Class
- Should English Teachers spend time talking about what an author meant?
- Keeping to the Text
Comments
"Not an add-on"
The mantra around me is that technology must be an integral part of the lesson/unit, not an add-on. The subject matter is still primary, but teachers are encouraged to incorporate various kinds of technology. We have Smart board in most rooms which we use with varying degrees of competence/creativity. Students are familiar with some kinds of technology, not necessarily skills that they need for the future, so we are encouraged to create opportunities for them to learn something beyond Facebook, texting, PowerPoint, youtube. This year we wre required to work with the digital learning center to design such experiences. As always, we struggle teaching students to evaluate sources and properly handlle research. Technology has made plagiarism easier for students but also easier for teacher to track some of it. I love learning technology myself- although the students are way ahead of me!
kbrooks
Tech and the classroom
This was the basis of my Master's research. It is a fact that we (yes, us) have created this new technology-dependent 'beast' if you may. Trying to teach them in a way that was developed during the advent of the industrial era (most students don't even know when that occurred) is boring, at best. I recently read an article (I hope this doesn't violate any rules since this is my first post) that says classics are outdated http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/are_literary_classics_obsolete/?utm_sour.... Combine these two thoughts and obviously we are experiencing a disconnect within our own generation which is growing as our children do. We must grow together, not apart. We need to utilize those things which most appeal to our students in an effort to enable them to become educated, viable members of our society.
What alienates our students
I believe what alienates our students is bad teaching and low expectations - not teaching the classics. In fact, teaching bad modern literature alienates our students. I don't think technology helps us connect with our students in of itself - though a good lesson involving anything (except bad literature) will always appeal to students.
Poor Instruction and Poor Selection
I agree with you as well as several others that the instruction, expectation, and selection is the problem. I taught special education for 12 years. I taught classic literature. When people heard that I was teaching Beowulf, The Canterbury Tales, and Macbeth to students with learning disabilities, they thought I was crazy. I was told not to even try with "these" kids.
I read the article as well as the comments on the page to the article. I do think the comments made several good points. How did the researchers define "influence" as well as what do they mean by classic literature? Besides, any author that says he or she is not influenced by Shakespeare is lying. Considering how many modern phrases were coined by him, authors use his creations on a regular basis.
My students had never been exposed to our shared literary history. They missed allusions in songs, movies, television shows, speeches, and modern literature. Once the exposure was there they saw the connection. They loved Beowulf, and we had lengthy discussion about what men and women want after reading The Wife of Bath's Tale. They also appreciated being treated the same as any other students. Not all students responded positively to the increased expectation, which is an entirely different issue. Overall the students responded favorably.
You have to know your students to make sure you select the right literature. I would not have chosen James Joyce's Finnegan's Wake. I also do not teach anything that I do not like or understand myself. I had an instructor who knew nothing about Southern or rural culture try to teach Faulkner. She did a horrible job, and I had to keep annoying her by correcting and explaining. She admitted she didn't like the story or really know Faulkner, but it was the next story in the book.
I do use technology for accessibility. Glogster and Edmodo allow students to respond who don't normally respond. I also use aduio books, ereaders, and Bookshare. All of these help students with disabilities access the text. I also had them watch Shakespeare's plays before we read them. I teach plays as drama and not as literature. So many people hate Shakespeare due to poor instruction in high school. It isn't always the what but the how.
Classics versus modern
I read the article and while I do believe there are many positive aspects of modern literature there are also some very negative ones as well. Literature today covers a wide range of topics relevant to today's children and also may approach topics with a fresh voice and awareness, such as homosexuality and inaccurate or missing historical topics such as Japanese Internment Camps. However, there is also a wide range of literature that may gain wide acceptance for a reading audience that lacks substantial literary value.
This same point is also true for literature older than the 21st century. A classic is a classic because it has stood the test of time with a theme that is ageless. My graduating seniors still identify Siddhartha as one of their favorite texts read and Catcher in the Rye is listed as second. Writers such as Rick Riordan has brought about a new wave of interest in Greek and Roman mythology and in our school system we are experiencing some interesting connections. The middle school students are reading the Riordan texts and then when they arrive at the high school they are delving into the Odyssey and Agamemnon and loving it.
I do not believe in throwing out the baby with the bathwater but learning to find connections between the past the present and the future. I believe it is key to our survival.
Update to previous comments
I signed on to this conversation last year and in the subsequent time I have taken a few technology related courses. I now have to update and modify my earlier response after having been exposed to some really wonderful and useful web 2.) tools. Programs such as livebinders.com, timeline, and toondoo, and many many more are really wonderful programs that can be utilized in conjunction with a lesson plan. Even if your school does not have a lot of easy access to technology many of our students do and they can check out these sites. Our school started utilizing Edmodo as a means of communication between teachers and students and it is a great chance to keep up to date lesson plans and assignments for students who are absent. While I will never replace the feel and smell of an old book in my hand technology can be incorporated from subtle to full core with relative ease and no expense if you spend some time searching out the possibilities. I have now incorporated some of the web 2.0 tools as optional assignment methods for many of my lessons and some of my students have excelled when those opportunities have been opened up.
Engagement
Are students more engaged by technology?
At my school they are. Students have said, "Why learn it if it isn't something I will use in real life, and technology is real life."
Also just read an interesting article on how social media is equated to friendship now. Of course students will be using it all the time. We might as well incorporate and show how to further education with the tools available.
Tommy Buteau
Including technology
I think that technology should be used only if it is the best way to teach the material or the lesson is enhanced by using technology.
So many times, technology feels "tacked on" to the lesson in order to hit a technology standard and the original intent of the lesson is lost.
Resisters Move Aside
I feel teachers that resist using technology need to find another job. What world are we preparing our students for? The world I send my students into is technology driven. If I resist incorporating technology, I cheat my students out of chances to practice and prepare for that world. Like it or not, this is how 21st Century students learn. 20th Century teachers need to adapt or move aside. (and I'm a digital immigrant myself; adapting has been fun and invigorating)
Technology
In this day and age, technology is already everywhere. It stands to reason that since the students are already very used to using it, that it would be beneficial to add it into the teaching model. Add to that the technology standards that most states are adopting and it become imperative that the teacher adapt and start including the use of technology in their classroom.
I am lucky, I have the smartboard and projector in the room that I am currently assigned. I hope that I am that lucky next year. It really does make interactive lessons easier to present.
TECH
I am a student, so I may be biased. But...TECHNOLOGY IS AWESOME. Without technology, education would be boring. Things like computers, and Smart Board games, etc. are what keep me interested. This is the age of technology, and I think that teachers should use that to their advantage.
I'm not saying that everything should be done using technology. Students also need to learn how to learn without technology. Resources such as newpapers, encyclopedias, and biographies shouldn't be forgotten. They are also a good learning tool.
-blackestblack88
Student Feedback
I love to hear this! Many of my students have technical skills that are limited to facebook and their phones, so when I took them into the computer lab and taught them how to use Moviemaker, to incorporate voiceovers, music and images into their presentations they were amazed! I insist that they leave high school with higher technical skills than I have- at least equivalent skills! I look forward to the day when they all have notepads and laptops so that we can make better use of the smartboards in the classroom and get rid of all of the paper. I think it is more interesting too.
technology
I have tried to use technology to help my skills classes engage in literature. I recently completed a "Facebook" project. Students created a facebook page (with posting from characters in the book) for their favorite character. I even let them use their phones to surf the web for tv shows and music from the 1960s (the setting of the novel). It was, for sure, one ofg their best projects. They definatley enjoyed the project and I was accuately able to assess their knowledge. It was fun for all of us!
Facebook Project
Great idea. I like where this is headed. I could even see using it to create a new direction for the character--kind of like fan fiction.
Tommy Buteau
Technology in the Classroom
I feel technology is good for the classroom when it is natural - smoothlyinfused with the curriculum. I see teachers at my school using it and it detracts from the lesson or what's going on. It's as if it's added in because it needs to be there. I know my students love technology infused into the class and I try to do just that - photos, video, powerpoint, animation, music, even interactive skype. But technology for technologies sake is sometimes the case.
This is a visual generation
I remember when I finished graduate school and told my mentor that I was taking a job in a high school. He said, "Don't make the same mistake I made when I started teaching. Don't ask them to tell you the name of their favorite novel. They probably won't have an answer. Ask them, instead, what's the name of their favorite song, TV show, or movie and they'll answer quickly." That was 17 years ago and he was right then and he's even more right now.
This is a visual generation -- TV and movies aside, these kids grew up with computers, laptops, iphones, ipods and more. If we want to be responsible teachers, we have to change with the times.
I believe very strongly that technology used correctly is not only an asset to the student but a necessary vehicle for reaching them. I have often said that anything I put on a Smartboard will be received more easily than simply giving a lesson or providing a handout. But the key is responsible teaching; it always is.
And it always has to be about what's best for the student. So, yes, I believe the role of technology in the classroom is essential and it should be used to augment lessons, not replace them.
Yes!
Well said. Students respond to technology, but like everything else it has its place. When used correctly, technology is an asset.
an analogy...
hello! it's me, again...
today, i want to share with you all something a teacher trainer said once during a workshop about ICT:
if an MD from 1900 enters today into a hospital, it may get dificult for him/her to work there as many things changed and there is plenty of technological devices which would result unknown...
however, if a teacher from the same epoc enters today into a classroom, s/he might feel confortable, as many things remain the same...
I know that this is an extreme analogy of both work places, but it also casts a light about our current situation as educators. I think that the quote clearly shows school have not properly integrated technology yet...
we must start as soon as posssible, not for the sake of it so as to follow the trend. however, the more tech there is inside the classroom, the more strategies, activities, abilities, topics, and many oher items would be brought to a new life...
hope you can agree/disagree
I agree, but I am not sure
I agree, but I am not sure about the "shows a school that has not properly integrated technology yet."
A better question would be this: when cars, rock and roll, yoyos, typewriters, and other devices from the past that incorporated productivity, information transportation, media consumption, and other things were first invented, how long did it take to apply them to every student in the classroom (were they ever)? Furthermore, did years past suffer because of the possible lack of immediate application (if it ever was)? What about academic integrity, consumption critical of content, and even appropriate use of the tools?
Methods versus Results
I agree - the end result is much more important. If hospitals had a high sucess rate in 1900 who cares which methods (unless they were hurtful) they used to get there. To care more about methods than results in education makes no sense to me.
I don't completely agree
First, I must just say that I love the appropriate use of technology in the classroom - incorporating movies, movie clips and songs, annotated texts, illuminated texts, forums etc. As you say, tech can bring new life into age-old subjects.
However, I think there's a vast difference between the work that goes on at a hospital and the work that goes on in a classroom. An MD from the 1900s could be responsible for an unnecessary death if thrown into a situation where modern technical knowledge could save a life. Could a good teacher from the 1900s still inspire students about a text or ignite their passion for a subject, even if faced with a class of kids and no knowledge of how to use the projector? I think so.
This is not to say that we shouldn't use technology in creative (and judicious) ways. I just don't feel the same urgency about it as you. But that's one of the wonderful things about teaching (and teachers). If you feel passionately about this, you stand a good chance of making the use of classroom technology a life-giving thing.
analogy for teaching
And yet, a Doctor from 1900 would feel perfectly comfortable knowing all of the parts of the human anatomy - those have not changed - and a good Doctor from that time could treat many medical conditions of today as well - and perhaps in some ways better (given the amount of time they could spend with a patient). It may also be true that many things that were thought to be good for patients (with ever advancing technology) turned out to be horrible - certain drugs, operations, etc.
Some things do not advance - some things work very well as they are. Nothing can replace a truly great lecture, or a class discussion, or a student alone with a book, a pen, and their thoughts. At least that's what I think.
in my opinion...
hello!
I think that some teachers are relactant to take advantage of technology. It will never substitute us, but it certainly makes our task a bit interesting, different, engaging, or even boring according to how we exploit it.
in my country, and especially in many primary and secondary schools, technological devices are not well exploited mostly due to the teachers. Our students have mobile phones, laptops, pc's, mp3 players and so on but we as teachers are still failing to "seize the day", as the poem says.
I do not mean that we should leave aside the board and chalk, but we should start including all, or at least one, of the many technological devices in order to enhance our teaching and engage our tech-students.
and don't worry, technology will never replace us, because there is always somebody behind the screen or the virtual world... and we, teachers, will always be needed to prepare the generations for the next world...
Glogster Edu
I wanted to let everyone know about Glogster edu. Glogster is a place where students can create digital posters. How many posters do you get where students do and then you only want to hang like 5 of them?? Glogster edu is great because the posters are all digital, students can get very creative with them, and you can post them on your classroom blog if you have one. I post all my students glogsters on my classroom blog and then I have students comment on them. Signing up with glogster EDU is free for teachers.
Alan November has some
Alan November has some interesting resources regarding technology in the class room. You can google search for his website to find his resources.
Digital Learners
I agree with all the posts supporting technology in the classroom. In our school district, teachers were recently given the green light to even utilize student cell phones for educational purposes. Students may use internet service on their phones to access literature databases, dictionaries, or any other eduationally related site should the teacher give permission. This is just one of the ways we can reach students who have become digital learners. Our students are stimulated by all of the digital resources out there in their everyday lives, we certainly wouldn't want them to "gear down" when they come in our classrooms.
digital voters
Digital voters are also another great way to use technology. Every student is given a voter (similar to texting on cell phone) and you can do class reviews, questions through that.
Gearing Down
I'm not sure that they do "gear down" when they utilize nondigital media. I think, in fact, that is arguable the other way around. In any case, I don't think the tool that is used (cell phone, pen and paper) are important in the same way - as what you do with those tools is important. You can have activities that are a total waste of time with a cell phone and you can do the same with a text book. The medium that is used does not make an activity better or worse - it just makes it different (in my opinion).
Advocate for Technology
I truly believe technology should be used in the classroom every single day. They enhance literature pieces and when technology is used every single student will participate! some things I love to use is iphoto, comiclife, and blogs!
Prezi's
Have you heard of Prezi's. It's like a powerpoint, but way better!
Importance of Technology
I think technology should play an integral role in today's classrooms. 21st century learners are going to be expected to know how to use these tools appropriately, and we are doing them a disservice if we do not teach them those skills. The internet is full of amazing tools for educators, many of them free, that can be incredibly helpful in engaging students in studying a variety of topics. I am student teaching this semester, and plan to use technology daily with my students.
Essential
Argh. I just deleted my post on the necessity of technology in the modern classroom. So much for technology! : )
I do believe that technology should be used in every classroom and that we should look at it as a "new" literacy. Just as Addison and Steele revolutionized periodicals, the new technologies in our classrooms are revolutionizing the way our students communicate. We need to help our students utilize these tools in effective and responsible ways. The best way to do that is by example. If I use someone's material for a PowerPoint, for example, I cite their work at the end of my presentation.
That being said, technology is not necessary for every class period. Sometimes a book in hand and a socratic circle is still the best way to communicate.
even though i use technology
even though i use technology every day, socratic circle and good ole books are great!
Computers and paper should be balanced
With technology becoming one of the main tools for communicating, I think it is very important to teach students to use it - and use it responsibly. I must admit, I am surprised when I take my middle school students to the lab and find that only one or two know how to type correctly, while the others hen peck their way through the keys. Sure, maybe innovative students can find new ways to type efficiently without putting the same fingers on the same keys that I do (many argue to me that they can type just fine they way they do), but I have yet to meet a student who can beat me with their off-beat method. It's valuable to learn how to represent yourself through type, through programs like PowerPoint, and through the use of websites.
As far as using technology in my classroom, I prefer to combine technology with good ol' paper. I want my students to know how to freewrite, to take notes, to write an outline, to organize an essay without hopping on the computer, because they won't have technology at their fingertips in every situation. They need know how to be flexible. So yes, we go to the lab to work on revisions and final drafts, but the students also keep writing notebooks and use them for less formal assignments.
One more point - don't have a smartboard (my school is way behind the times on technology, unfortunately; I use my personal laptop every day because the school computer is ancient), but I have a projector in my room, and I love having the option to whip out my computer to show a relevant Youtube video or photos or Keynote presentation. I find it helpful to have the option to use technology to compliment my regular lessons.
you tube
I find that including short video clips, such as youtube in the classroom keeps students interested and engaged.
Technology
Technology is grand, when it works, but the key here is when it works. In my school district 1/4 of the staff received new desktop computers while the majority continue to wait 1 1/2 years for the handing out of the laptops. By the time we finally get them they will be obsolete. In the meantime, I try to function on my school computer that has been there since 1999. I love technology and I love how the administration wants to push us all to learn about technology but learning the skills without the knowledge of how it can be applied within a classroom setting is not very helpful. I have taken courses and seminars to learn how to use software and online sites to create very cool lessons but most of the sites are then blocked by my district. We have 3 Smartboards to share among 90 teachers. As much as I enjoy access to the new, I still prefer to hold a book in my hand.
A Book in the Hand is worth...
I like books in my hand too. Your situation is so sad - so frustrating. It seems to me to also be the reverse of the situation that many teachers find themselves in. Often, they have the newest, best equipment - but they don't have the training to use that equipment.
free training websites
There are many free training websites that can teach you how to use anything!
The role of technology in the classroom
I do think that sometimes technology can feel more like a chore than a luxury, however, I think it's going to become a crucial part of the classroom environment. I am starting my own website for my journalism class so that i can bring the class into the 21st century. We will use the website to communicate, but mostly to post news and information. It will be authentic publishing (with school restrictions). i think the illuminated texts are a great way to use technology to "illuminate" the meaning of language that is being used.
As a self admitted luddite,
As a self admitted luddite, I am slowly moving into the age of technology--I can make a power point and run a power point presentation. I can project on to Smart board, but the board won't hook up to be used fully so I still run things from the computer. I still have an overhead and a blackboard in my room. All is fair game for use and I think all teachers use what is expedient to the content being taught and the style that best fits the teacher and class.
But I admit big reluctance to podcasting or video casting and even posting all my notes and handouts on line. Administration is ever pushing for us to do this and I see my students wanting to completely rely on this kind of teaching experience. Why write down the notes--I'll download later. Why write down the vocab words down--I'll get them later online. Why listen to the lecture--I'll listen to it later. Why go to class--I'll get it all online. While I know that can be valuable, I've been hired to be a teacher in the classroom--not the virtual teacher.
One of my co-workers put together podcasts to help her 9th graders study vocabulary. They would download her podcast and listen to it over and over on their Ipods. One week she didn't have it available. Her students did miserably on the quiz. Students and parents complained that her not having the podcast available contributed to the poor grades and that she should keep that in mind as she finalized the grades. YE GAD--it cannot come to this.
I'll use technology yes, but I will not become a Borg and a part of the Collective- for those of you Star Trek New Generation viewers.
Why not?
Why not take advantage of the fact that students LOVE technology. When my classes use the computer lab, no matter what the assignment, my most reluctant learners wake up and pay attention.
Putting everything online has actually made my job easier. I hold students accountable for work they have missed: they check the calendar, download the materials, and complete assignments completely on their own. I post assignments online and even allow students to turn in work electronically. Students' grades have improved as a result. Who can argue with that??
I agree students do love
I agree students do love technology!!! When you have a technology project it is always almost the case that you get 100% participation!!
Agree
I would have to agree with your statement on 100% participation. For every technology assignment we do in class, I have the majority of my students participate.
PodCast
But the podcasts worked to help the students learn. I can understand that you don't think it should be the teacher's responsiblity to do everything for the students, but the next step would be for the students or their parents(families) to create the podcasts.
Vocabulary lessons
I began using Quizlet for my ninth graders to learn their Greek and Latin root words, prefixes, and suffixes. I give a very short quiz every week on the 4 current words and add random words from previous weeks. There is such a difference this year with using the quizlet site. There are games for them to play using the words, and practice tests that can be reconfigured many times. I give one test each nine weeks and almost all my students are getting 90-95% scores, which shows they are retaining the meanings in the words. We have lots of fun through the week finding words with the roots in the work we do in class.
My point is that technology can engage the kids, and when they are engaged, there is a greater chance that they will learn.
Using Technology in My Classroom
I teach in a college prep school in Florida where our classes are 90 minutes long; I find using a variety of activities within that time frame keeps the students engaged, interested, and learning. My class instruction previously was composed of teacher lecture and teacher directed questions. I have, over the last few years expanded my teaching methods to include blogs, wikis and multimedia. For instance, I am just finishing a unit on ballads. I introduced the students to the ballad form with a handout containing several ballads and an explanation of the standard ballad format. After discussion, I played student recorded ballads from previous years that are posted on our class wiki. The students could read along on the screen while they listened to the students recite their ballad. This sparked student interest as we continued with a discussion of what ballad elements the students had used in their writing. After the students write their ballads, they will be posted on our class blog, and each student will comment on two student's ballads; this will allow students to have a wider audience for their ballad than just their teacher. I will select the best ballads to be recorded and will post them on our class wiki to use in my instruction next year.
I would hesitate to say that teachers not using technology are keeping students from receiving a good education; however, students should be actively engaged in their learning; using multimedia in your lesson and allowing students to creaste multimedia projects does keep students interested and involved. It's an effective method for students to enjoy literature and to love learning; that is after all, our key objective as teachers of literature.
Blogs and Wikis
I hope to use both blogs and wikis with my students this year. Did you have success with any one website? My school uses their own gmail accounts, so I'm considering using google sites and blogger. I created a mock class blog for a summer course at my university with some of the ideas I really like (daily scribe, space for questions, etc.) at mrscenglish2010.blogspot.com
one more thing ...
One great benefit of today's technology is that it has given us the ability to quickly gather large amounts of material and information. This is also a great pitfall. I believe that this new-found ability is training and coaxing all of us, not just the students, to embrace breadth rather than depth. This results in a tendency to make quick judgements, to become easily bored and to lose critical thinking skills. Maybe that's one reason why I am wary. It might also be the reason why I am so drawn to illuminated texts, since they demonstrate a use of technology that forces us to slow down, evaluate, re-work and make literary connections.
maybe I'm just old-fashioned ...
Technology can be a useful classroom tool ... illuminated texts, relevant video and audio clips, web-based research (potential problems there, though), presentations, projects etc. I would use any of these in my classroom.
That said, I am reluctant to sacrifice much classroom time to these things and I soberly evaluate the merits of any technology-based activity before using it. The value of simply wrestling with a pure text should not be underestimated. Neither should the ability of today's young people to do so (in spite of having grown up in a world of media and technology). I also think that the face-to-face interaction and discussion between the class and teacher (and between classmates) is invaluable. So much communication today occurs by way of a "technological mediator" such as texting, email, forums and chat (all useful in their own way, granted).
I do agree, however, that it's important that we teach our students how to carry out web-based research intelligently and how to evaluate web materials for accuracy.
"I do agree, however, that
"I do agree, however, that it's important that we teach our students how to carry out web-based research intelligently and how to evaluate web materials for accuracy."
Yes! I think that many students cannot even discern the difference between fact and opinion any more. Furthermore, I notice students also expect so much instant gratification that they don't even read something to entirety or critically - almost as if they expect texting language in something that is so much more deep. If the majority of new media is so to-the-point and shallow, how could we possibly expect students to have that level of concentration on something that is not so instant and shallow of meaning?